Okay, I'm going to take the complete opposite view of everyone else
.
I was raised in a hockey family -- 5 am practices, weekends away for tournies, the whole nine yards. I refuse to do that to my kids.
My husband and I very strongly believe that children need lots of time to just be kids. That means at least an hour or two each evening to go to the frog pond with their friends, go for a family walk, go with me to get groceries, wrestle with dad, etc., etc. Our kids (during the school year) get up at 7:15, and spend the next 9 hours rushing from home to school and back again. They have two recesses of 20 minutes each as their downtime during the day. Then they come home and have supper, spend an hour or so on homework, and then have a bit of a chance to play. I think the downtime is really important. Our culture tends to be one of non-stop rushing, and I don't think it's healthy. We need to have a chance to relax, let our bp stabilize, and just enjoy life.
We do have our kids in one after-school activity (everyone on the same night -- Wednesdays) and on weekends we have church on Sunday. Lots of other opportunities come up that will consume our time, and when they do come up, we do tend to say yes to them ... because we have the time and energy
. This summer, I've been able to book a bunch of Saturday day trips because we purposely haven't committed to any summer sports or extra-curriculars.
I do agree that organized activities turn out kids that are confident, talented, and well-rounded kids. But I think it's even more important to give kids the experience of not being over-scheduled, and of allowing them the chance to just be kids.
The more I read Richard Louv, the more validated I feel about this. Allowing kids to have more free play time (especially outdoors) can have the same benefits as organized activities -- making friends, increasing physical skills & fitness, etc.
So, my advice would be to do what you feel is best for your children (note: not necessarily for yourself
). If you feel that your children would benefit more by spending evenings shuttled from one activity to the next (ie. 4 kids = LOTS of shuttling!), so be it. But if you feel your kids would benefit more so from having more free time, then feel confident in your decision, explain it to your kids, and stick by it.
Just my 2 cents, fwiw!

I was raised in a hockey family -- 5 am practices, weekends away for tournies, the whole nine yards. I refuse to do that to my kids.
My husband and I very strongly believe that children need lots of time to just be kids. That means at least an hour or two each evening to go to the frog pond with their friends, go for a family walk, go with me to get groceries, wrestle with dad, etc., etc. Our kids (during the school year) get up at 7:15, and spend the next 9 hours rushing from home to school and back again. They have two recesses of 20 minutes each as their downtime during the day. Then they come home and have supper, spend an hour or so on homework, and then have a bit of a chance to play. I think the downtime is really important. Our culture tends to be one of non-stop rushing, and I don't think it's healthy. We need to have a chance to relax, let our bp stabilize, and just enjoy life.
We do have our kids in one after-school activity (everyone on the same night -- Wednesdays) and on weekends we have church on Sunday. Lots of other opportunities come up that will consume our time, and when they do come up, we do tend to say yes to them ... because we have the time and energy

I do agree that organized activities turn out kids that are confident, talented, and well-rounded kids. But I think it's even more important to give kids the experience of not being over-scheduled, and of allowing them the chance to just be kids.
The more I read Richard Louv, the more validated I feel about this. Allowing kids to have more free play time (especially outdoors) can have the same benefits as organized activities -- making friends, increasing physical skills & fitness, etc.
So, my advice would be to do what you feel is best for your children (note: not necessarily for yourself

Just my 2 cents, fwiw!
Comment