I respectfully disagree with you. I am ONLY employed by my daycare families in the way that they have decided to use my service. They don't set the rules, they don't pay my benefits or SS tax or any other tax. They are not my employers. If they were my employers, I would demand a raise (to at least minimum wage) and benefits, and I wouldn't have to worry about taxes, they would.
To the OP - I'm in agreement with the other pp's who asked what the difference is between what you did to your first daycare (left because of ONE snow day) and what your second daycare did to you (termed for a seeming lack of trust)? Trust is paramount in this business. If you didn't trust your new daycare, you had no business taking the child there. Sensing that you didn't trust them, and possibly being a difficult parent, as a daycare provider, I would have termed you also. As for the bruises - if you had any doubt at all about them, you should have taken child to the doctor to get it checked out. If you didn't, you obviously didn't honestly think that anything wrong was going on in that daycare. And if you did honestly think there was something wrong there, you should have pulled that child long before now.
You pulled the child from a daycare you "liked" because they closed for one day (most providers encourage a backup provider in case of emergency or illness) and yet you left the child in a daycare that you didn't trust for weeks (months?). What is your motivator here? If it was all about the child, you would have left child in the first daycare. Missing one day is not a reason to leave. Providers get sick, we are only human. If she had just been sick, and that's why she closed, would you still have pulled child?
And after this long post, I wonder if you just came on here to slam this daycare because they pissed you off. I see you haven't come back to respond or answer any questions.
To the OP - I'm in agreement with the other pp's who asked what the difference is between what you did to your first daycare (left because of ONE snow day) and what your second daycare did to you (termed for a seeming lack of trust)? Trust is paramount in this business. If you didn't trust your new daycare, you had no business taking the child there. Sensing that you didn't trust them, and possibly being a difficult parent, as a daycare provider, I would have termed you also. As for the bruises - if you had any doubt at all about them, you should have taken child to the doctor to get it checked out. If you didn't, you obviously didn't honestly think that anything wrong was going on in that daycare. And if you did honestly think there was something wrong there, you should have pulled that child long before now.
You pulled the child from a daycare you "liked" because they closed for one day (most providers encourage a backup provider in case of emergency or illness) and yet you left the child in a daycare that you didn't trust for weeks (months?). What is your motivator here? If it was all about the child, you would have left child in the first daycare. Missing one day is not a reason to leave. Providers get sick, we are only human. If she had just been sick, and that's why she closed, would you still have pulled child?
And after this long post, I wonder if you just came on here to slam this daycare because they pissed you off. I see you haven't come back to respond or answer any questions.
Comment