My reply to Needavac was NOT meant to sound rude or condescending.
I am sorry if you felt it read that way.
She stated that I probably knew who it was and it (the OP's post) must make sense to me and I simply replied that is does.
IMO, I don't see how that comes across as rude and condescending at all. :confused:
I most certainly would NEVER give up who an unregistered poster is and would NEVER violate that kind of privacy. EVER.
I have also NEVER advertised that mods know who unregistered posters are although it does and has come up within a thread.
......and in all honesty, we don't ALWAYS know.
It isn't like there is a big flashing neon sign saying so.
I also don't see where moderator's are advertising that they know who unregistered poster are.
This is a public forum and in reality, there really is no such thing as internet privacy.
I am sorry if you felt it read that way.
She stated that I probably knew who it was and it (the OP's post) must make sense to me and I simply replied that is does.
IMO, I don't see how that comes across as rude and condescending at all. :confused:
I most certainly would NEVER give up who an unregistered poster is and would NEVER violate that kind of privacy. EVER.
I have also NEVER advertised that mods know who unregistered posters are although it does and has come up within a thread.
......and in all honesty, we don't ALWAYS know.
It isn't like there is a big flashing neon sign saying so.
I also don't see where moderator's are advertising that they know who unregistered poster are.
This is a public forum and in reality, there really is no such thing as internet privacy.
Comment