It is normal ... it's very typical for children this age to be curious obout their bodies and the bodies of their friends ... but in my state this type of behavior is not considered "acceptable" in a child care or school setting.
Think of it like biting ... a child bites and leaves a large bruise or ruptures the skin. The child is not severely hurt and this type of behavior is "typical" for the children's age ... licensing in our state would still consider this reportable because it left a mark/broke the skin. Their concern is the possibility of infection and passing disease to children.
Another example for our state is a child throws a block and it hits a child let's say on the arm ... not reportable. But let's say that the child gets hit in the head. No mark is left. This is still reportable in our state because the child was hit in the head and there could be a possible head injury that we can't visually see. Licencing understands that this type of behavior is normal and typical for children their age but it isn't acceptable and needs to be taken care of and stopped if it continues.
KWIM? Again, it varies from state to state though and some states are more relaxed while others are more strict.
Also if this behavior of a more sexual nature is happening because the child has been exposed to sexual acts at home or is being sexually abused somehow the provider will want a paper trail which would show this behavior as documented and that she self-reported so that she isn't blamed by the parents if they suddenly find themselves being questioned by CPS. It will also help CPS in their case against the parents because the provider is a witness to this child's sexual behavior. This is an EXTREME case but it has happened and happens more than you think. What seems like "typical" natural curiosity could be reported to CPS where they could possibly have a case already opened on the child for what is actually not "natural curiosity". Am I making sense?
Think of it like biting ... a child bites and leaves a large bruise or ruptures the skin. The child is not severely hurt and this type of behavior is "typical" for the children's age ... licensing in our state would still consider this reportable because it left a mark/broke the skin. Their concern is the possibility of infection and passing disease to children.
Another example for our state is a child throws a block and it hits a child let's say on the arm ... not reportable. But let's say that the child gets hit in the head. No mark is left. This is still reportable in our state because the child was hit in the head and there could be a possible head injury that we can't visually see. Licencing understands that this type of behavior is normal and typical for children their age but it isn't acceptable and needs to be taken care of and stopped if it continues.
KWIM? Again, it varies from state to state though and some states are more relaxed while others are more strict.
Also if this behavior of a more sexual nature is happening because the child has been exposed to sexual acts at home or is being sexually abused somehow the provider will want a paper trail which would show this behavior as documented and that she self-reported so that she isn't blamed by the parents if they suddenly find themselves being questioned by CPS. It will also help CPS in their case against the parents because the provider is a witness to this child's sexual behavior. This is an EXTREME case but it has happened and happens more than you think. What seems like "typical" natural curiosity could be reported to CPS where they could possibly have a case already opened on the child for what is actually not "natural curiosity". Am I making sense?
Comment