Some of you may know that I run a home daycare. I have appx 7 to 8 kiddos a day, but that fluctuates depending on if the mom or dad has off, etc.
Right now I babysit for one family that has a just turned 3 yr old and a 19 month old. Back in August, the mom of that family told me she was surprisingly pregnant and asked me to told a spot for her baby due in April. We talked about it and the baby has to be 8 weeks old to join my daycare so the starting date would be approximately the first of June depending on when the baby is born. That's fine.
The mom is taking maternity from the first of April til the first of June. And she doesn't want or need daycare for her other two during that maternity time. I really did figure she would still send them at least part time because of having a newborn and taking care of two others, but whatever.
She pays me $185 a week now for two kids, which for my area, that is the going rate. My question is during that maternity time what do you think would be fair to charge her? The kids aren't coming, but I'm holding a spot for her two and the newborn.
The next part is this. When the kiddos come back in June, it will only be three days one week and two days the next. Every week, like that. So, it won't be a full time basis, which I'm fine with because I'm having a baby in July and taking maternity time.
What would you think would be the fair and yet the best way for me to charge them? It wouldn't be full time because the days not on our contract I won't watch them. It's not a five day a week thing. And they are good people and won't push that. I've been caring for there children for almost a year now. I don't think I should just charge them by the day though because I'm holding a spot for them. But I don't want to charge full time, which would be $285 because then I would feel like they would have the right to bring them full time, 5 days a week. I'm thinking I need a happy medium. Something more then by the day, but yet not a full time price.
Any thoughts?
Right now I babysit for one family that has a just turned 3 yr old and a 19 month old. Back in August, the mom of that family told me she was surprisingly pregnant and asked me to told a spot for her baby due in April. We talked about it and the baby has to be 8 weeks old to join my daycare so the starting date would be approximately the first of June depending on when the baby is born. That's fine.
The mom is taking maternity from the first of April til the first of June. And she doesn't want or need daycare for her other two during that maternity time. I really did figure she would still send them at least part time because of having a newborn and taking care of two others, but whatever.
She pays me $185 a week now for two kids, which for my area, that is the going rate. My question is during that maternity time what do you think would be fair to charge her? The kids aren't coming, but I'm holding a spot for her two and the newborn.
The next part is this. When the kiddos come back in June, it will only be three days one week and two days the next. Every week, like that. So, it won't be a full time basis, which I'm fine with because I'm having a baby in July and taking maternity time.
What would you think would be the fair and yet the best way for me to charge them? It wouldn't be full time because the days not on our contract I won't watch them. It's not a five day a week thing. And they are good people and won't push that. I've been caring for there children for almost a year now. I don't think I should just charge them by the day though because I'm holding a spot for them. But I don't want to charge full time, which would be $285 because then I would feel like they would have the right to bring them full time, 5 days a week. I'm thinking I need a happy medium. Something more then by the day, but yet not a full time price.
Any thoughts?
Comment