Hello ya'll,
So I keep getting calls for people who need infant care, I am currently full at 4 kids (1 is my son) so I can't take anymore kids. When people ask how long my wait list is I hate having to tell them "Well, either when a child leaves or I ask them to leave I will have a spot open...otherwise they are with me till they are 2 so you have about a 1yr 7 month wait for the oldest!" I wanted to start taking some preschool kids after I cut down to just two infants but no one in my area needed toddler/preschool care thanks to the local military friendly cheap/free schools so I am only being able to stay in business by offering infant care (and have since filled those other two spots).
I know that a lot of it is due to research and the developmental needs of children under 2 but I have NEVER personally thought of a 2yr old as an 'infant' especially since my DCB 15m old can clothe himself, feed himself, and even has picked up a few words and has gotten the hang of baby sign really really well to the point that we communicate pretty often throughout the day with sign (DCM is flabbergasted! She hasn't bothered trying to learn any of it and doesn't understand what he is trying to say!)
My questions is, where did this newer definition of the term 'infant' come from exactly? Why exactly is it that under 2 is now considered an 'infant'. I truly hope it isn't because modern parents want a reason to baby their kids as long as possible, so show me the research please?
I'm being serious, not snotty....I really do want to know the reasonings behind this. I took a Child Development class but we didn't really focus on infants that much :/ I think the professor was biased towards Preschoolers as we focused on that a lot.
So I keep getting calls for people who need infant care, I am currently full at 4 kids (1 is my son) so I can't take anymore kids. When people ask how long my wait list is I hate having to tell them "Well, either when a child leaves or I ask them to leave I will have a spot open...otherwise they are with me till they are 2 so you have about a 1yr 7 month wait for the oldest!" I wanted to start taking some preschool kids after I cut down to just two infants but no one in my area needed toddler/preschool care thanks to the local military friendly cheap/free schools so I am only being able to stay in business by offering infant care (and have since filled those other two spots).
I know that a lot of it is due to research and the developmental needs of children under 2 but I have NEVER personally thought of a 2yr old as an 'infant' especially since my DCB 15m old can clothe himself, feed himself, and even has picked up a few words and has gotten the hang of baby sign really really well to the point that we communicate pretty often throughout the day with sign (DCM is flabbergasted! She hasn't bothered trying to learn any of it and doesn't understand what he is trying to say!)
My questions is, where did this newer definition of the term 'infant' come from exactly? Why exactly is it that under 2 is now considered an 'infant'. I truly hope it isn't because modern parents want a reason to baby their kids as long as possible, so show me the research please?
I'm being serious, not snotty....I really do want to know the reasonings behind this. I took a Child Development class but we didn't really focus on infants that much :/ I think the professor was biased towards Preschoolers as we focused on that a lot.
Comment