I don't think the mom is abusing her child. I think the mom has a lot on her plate, is going at this by herself and may not be the brightest crayon in the box
However, regardless of her reasons or excuses - it is illegal and very dangerous to her child. My goal is not to get the mom in trouble. My goal is to protect her child, get the mom some help and protect myself and my business. This is why a CPST was my first call and not CPS. However, legally I am required to report it. If I don't I could face legal ramifications. My concern right now is who I report it to.
While I do agree with you that back then many of us where not using car seats. The laws driving in general was different then it is today.
Laws in my state: Except as provided in subsection H of this section, a person shall not operate a motor vehicle on the highways in this state when transporting a child who is under five years of age unless that child is properly secured in a child restraint system.
Section H: A person who operates a motor vehicle that was originally manufactured without passenger restraint devices.
2. A person who operates a motor vehicle that is also a recreational vehicle as defined in section 41-2142.
3. A person who operates a commercial motor vehicle and who holds a current commercial driver license issued pursuant to chapter 8 of this title.
4. A person who must transport a child in an emergency to obtain necessary medical care.
5. A person who operates an authorized emergency vehicle that is transporting a child for medical care.
6. A person who transports more than one child under eight years of age in a motor vehicle that because of the restricted size of the passenger area does not provide sufficient area for the required number of child restraint systems, if both of the following conditions are met:
(a) At least one child is restrained or seated as required by this section.
(b) The person has secured as many of the other children in child restraint systems pursuant to this section as is reasonable given the restricted size of the passenger area and the number of passengers being transported in the motor vehicle.
A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of fifty dollars, except that a civil penalty shall not be imposed if the person makes a sufficient showing that the motor vehicle has been subsequently equipped with a child restraint system that meets the standards adopted pursuant to subsection C of this section. A sufficient showing may include a receipt mailed to the appropriate court officer that evidences purchase or acquisition of a child restraint system. The court imposing and collecting the civil penalty shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, the monies, exclusive of any surcharges imposed pursuant to sections 12-116.01 and 12-116.02, in the child restraint fund.
From what I saw the only two occupants in the car were the child and her mother. Therefore she needs to be retrained. Now, I do know that in the instance of a vehicle not having a backseat a child can legally ride in the front passenger seat provided that the airbags are turned off with a key and they are properly restrained in a car seat or booster.
The hospital CPST did state that if all the seat belts in the mother's backseat were broken then they could get the child a car seat or booster that would restrain her properly in the front seat. It is not ideal, but it is safer then her current situation.
If I had an extra car seat I would lone it to her in a heartbeat. But I don't. under no circumstances do I travel with the children and in the event of an emergency where a child needs to be transported, 911 is called to transport children. The parents know this.

However, regardless of her reasons or excuses - it is illegal and very dangerous to her child. My goal is not to get the mom in trouble. My goal is to protect her child, get the mom some help and protect myself and my business. This is why a CPST was my first call and not CPS. However, legally I am required to report it. If I don't I could face legal ramifications. My concern right now is who I report it to.
While I do agree with you that back then many of us where not using car seats. The laws driving in general was different then it is today.
Laws in my state: Except as provided in subsection H of this section, a person shall not operate a motor vehicle on the highways in this state when transporting a child who is under five years of age unless that child is properly secured in a child restraint system.
Section H: A person who operates a motor vehicle that was originally manufactured without passenger restraint devices.
2. A person who operates a motor vehicle that is also a recreational vehicle as defined in section 41-2142.
3. A person who operates a commercial motor vehicle and who holds a current commercial driver license issued pursuant to chapter 8 of this title.
4. A person who must transport a child in an emergency to obtain necessary medical care.
5. A person who operates an authorized emergency vehicle that is transporting a child for medical care.
6. A person who transports more than one child under eight years of age in a motor vehicle that because of the restricted size of the passenger area does not provide sufficient area for the required number of child restraint systems, if both of the following conditions are met:
(a) At least one child is restrained or seated as required by this section.
(b) The person has secured as many of the other children in child restraint systems pursuant to this section as is reasonable given the restricted size of the passenger area and the number of passengers being transported in the motor vehicle.
A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of fifty dollars, except that a civil penalty shall not be imposed if the person makes a sufficient showing that the motor vehicle has been subsequently equipped with a child restraint system that meets the standards adopted pursuant to subsection C of this section. A sufficient showing may include a receipt mailed to the appropriate court officer that evidences purchase or acquisition of a child restraint system. The court imposing and collecting the civil penalty shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, the monies, exclusive of any surcharges imposed pursuant to sections 12-116.01 and 12-116.02, in the child restraint fund.
From what I saw the only two occupants in the car were the child and her mother. Therefore she needs to be retrained. Now, I do know that in the instance of a vehicle not having a backseat a child can legally ride in the front passenger seat provided that the airbags are turned off with a key and they are properly restrained in a car seat or booster.
The hospital CPST did state that if all the seat belts in the mother's backseat were broken then they could get the child a car seat or booster that would restrain her properly in the front seat. It is not ideal, but it is safer then her current situation.
If I had an extra car seat I would lone it to her in a heartbeat. But I don't. under no circumstances do I travel with the children and in the event of an emergency where a child needs to be transported, 911 is called to transport children. The parents know this.
Comment