I know I've been doing a lot of complaining lately - but this really made me mad today, and it is so great to be able to bring these situations to people who have been there and done that.
My contract (which ALL of my parents agreed to and signed) states that I don't charge for days that I am closed. However, if I am scheduled to be open, and the parent chooses not to bring their child, the regular rate applies.
My SA's have two days off of school next week. I'm closed for one and open for the other. I'm not charging for the closed day, but I expect payment for the day that I am open. I also charge an added "full day" fee, but I don't charge it if the child isn't here - they just pay the regular rate.
Family 1 let me know that their children were not going to be here on the day that I am open. Fine with me. Fast forward to today (payment day) and the parent is giving me attitude and doesn't want to pay for the day that I'm open because the children aren't going to be here. They were so rude about it that I got flustered and angry (something that I try not to do) and just took the money for 3 days, pretty much telling them to pay and get out (without actually saying those words, but my attitude implied it).
Now, my question is, do you think my policy is unfair? I still don't understand how it is my problem if they decide not to send their children on a day that I'm open for care. This same parent has never given me any trouble with paying when days are missed due to illness - I don't see how this is any different, really.
I can't decide whether to address this further next week. The two options that I'm considering at this point are either A) Printing off a copy of the signed agreement and highlighting the payment section, without saying much more about it - straight and to the point, or B) Just foregoing the money, but telling the family that if they don't want to pay for days that I am open, then they no longer have the option to send their children on teacher work days or holidays when I am open for the full day.
Thoughts?
My contract (which ALL of my parents agreed to and signed) states that I don't charge for days that I am closed. However, if I am scheduled to be open, and the parent chooses not to bring their child, the regular rate applies.
My SA's have two days off of school next week. I'm closed for one and open for the other. I'm not charging for the closed day, but I expect payment for the day that I am open. I also charge an added "full day" fee, but I don't charge it if the child isn't here - they just pay the regular rate.
Family 1 let me know that their children were not going to be here on the day that I am open. Fine with me. Fast forward to today (payment day) and the parent is giving me attitude and doesn't want to pay for the day that I'm open because the children aren't going to be here. They were so rude about it that I got flustered and angry (something that I try not to do) and just took the money for 3 days, pretty much telling them to pay and get out (without actually saying those words, but my attitude implied it).
Now, my question is, do you think my policy is unfair? I still don't understand how it is my problem if they decide not to send their children on a day that I'm open for care. This same parent has never given me any trouble with paying when days are missed due to illness - I don't see how this is any different, really.
I can't decide whether to address this further next week. The two options that I'm considering at this point are either A) Printing off a copy of the signed agreement and highlighting the payment section, without saying much more about it - straight and to the point, or B) Just foregoing the money, but telling the family that if they don't want to pay for days that I am open, then they no longer have the option to send their children on teacher work days or holidays when I am open for the full day.
Thoughts?
Comment