Oh, Canada
Collapse
X
-
that doesn't make sense then. Because all the licensed daycares here have to supply the food and they need to follow the day nursury act. The parents have nothing to do with the day nursury act. They are not the ones who signed up for the licensed, it was the daycare, so its the daycares problem not the parents. kwim. You can't charge a third person party for something like this.- Flag
Comment
-
that doesn't make sense then. Because all the licensed daycares here have to supply the food and they need to follow the day nursury act. The parents have nothing to do with the day nursury act. They are not the ones who signed up for the licensed, it was the daycare, so its the daycares problem not the parents. kwim. You can't charge a third person party for something like this.- Flag
Comment
-
it had nothing to do with licensing, it was a school policy. You either bought their hot lunch or you have to supply your own lunch but at their standards--sounds like a way to get money out of parents. They have now changed the policy. and since when have ritz crackers be considered a grain product.- Flag
Comment
-
- Flag
Comment
-
Well, I get it, but I don't necessarily like it.
Charging $5 for the Ritz Crackers is a little bit like us charging $5 to supply a diaper. It's not because the diaper costs $5. It's because it's the parent's responsibility to provide them, and not "forget". I don't do that, btw, but I know a lot of providers do have a charge for that sort of thing.
I get that mom probably thought of the potatoes as a grain. Our food program doesn't, though, and I it sure sounds like the school/daycare provided the information to parent.
They can also only keep so much food on hand for the forgetters. Today it was this lady with a grain, tomorrow someone will forget a veggie, or milk. How much can the school keep in reserve easily to fill in the holes? A slice of whole-grain bread would have been better, obviously.- Flag
Comment
Comment