I know this sounds like a silly question or a question that I should know the answer to, but I am just not so sure on this! I have been feeding infants for over 14 years, I have a 10 year old and an 8 mo. old. I just fed the daycare babies what the parents told me when I worked in a center and honestly don't remember what or when they ate and at what ages. I am on the food program and when a child turns 8 months, you have to give solids for Breakfast and Lunch and then for the snacks, breast milk or formula. Ok, I understand the snacks because it is the liquids, but it's the breakfast and lunch that I have a question about.
Do you think that that babies who are, say, in the 8-9 (maybe 10) month span need to have both a breakfast and lunch that consists of solids, plus a dinner? Plus my son only will eat 4, maybe 5 ounces of formula at a time and I would rather have him eat the formula, after all, don't babies get most of their nutrients from the formula or breast milk?
I ask this because I give my son solids for breakfast and dinner and he eats both a whole tub or an equivalent of and cereal for each. I don't see the reasoning of giving solids for lunch. I would rather have him and the kids in my care eat more of the formula or breast milk than anything. Am I wrong in thinking this?
Do you think that that babies who are, say, in the 8-9 (maybe 10) month span need to have both a breakfast and lunch that consists of solids, plus a dinner? Plus my son only will eat 4, maybe 5 ounces of formula at a time and I would rather have him eat the formula, after all, don't babies get most of their nutrients from the formula or breast milk?
I ask this because I give my son solids for breakfast and dinner and he eats both a whole tub or an equivalent of and cereal for each. I don't see the reasoning of giving solids for lunch. I would rather have him and the kids in my care eat more of the formula or breast milk than anything. Am I wrong in thinking this?
Comment