I had this happen back in 2009.
My first client at the daycare.
Family had been with me for about 8 months. Payment was due on Friday for the upcoming week. Child was scheduled for Friday but DCM took the day off. I reminded her of payment due and she said she'd swing it by Saturday after work. Saturday came and went...no payment. On Sunday I got a text from her telling me that one of DCD's friends is doing daycare now and much closer to where they live. I reminded her that I only accept notices on Friday and I'd calculate her balance.
Monday DCM drops off, writes me a check and goes to work. DCD picks DCG up and said they are wanting all her belongings, that she is starting the new daycare the next day and the balance of the check should cover everything. The check written was only for $210. (The extra $100 was my accrued time off I hadn't taken.)
I had to scramble to get dcg's things together and told dcd specifically that I hadn't had time to clean the bottles because I do that after hours. He didn't mind, said he'd wash them at home. I packed up girls things and they left.
2 days later I get a long email from dcd about how dcm accused me of not properly caring for their daughter, how her diaper rash was exacerbated by me not changing her every 1-2 hours and that the bottles I sent home had mold in them. He informed me that no additional payment would be made and that if I attempted to contact them or collect, they'd contact the police. (I had to laugh at that one. The police don't care about civil issues.)
Then about 2 days later, Child Protective showed up at my door. I had a hunch they were coming. As soon as she walked in the door, I pulled dcg's file, showed the balance they owed and the check they stopped payment on. She knew right away it was a disgruntled former client that was on a high horse because of money and not because of child endangerment. She asked me what year my home was build (at the time it was only 16 years old), we don't live in a flood plain or near water and she asked to see the other infant bottles. No mold.
Apparently dcd provided pictured to Child Protective of the so called bottles and yes, there was mold in them but as I had mentioned to them, how do you know that those are the same 2 bottles that were here. How do you know they didn't find those out in the car or under a couch?
In the end, I got the last because it was quite easy to discredit the validity of the claim.
My first client at the daycare.
Family had been with me for about 8 months. Payment was due on Friday for the upcoming week. Child was scheduled for Friday but DCM took the day off. I reminded her of payment due and she said she'd swing it by Saturday after work. Saturday came and went...no payment. On Sunday I got a text from her telling me that one of DCD's friends is doing daycare now and much closer to where they live. I reminded her that I only accept notices on Friday and I'd calculate her balance.
Monday DCM drops off, writes me a check and goes to work. DCD picks DCG up and said they are wanting all her belongings, that she is starting the new daycare the next day and the balance of the check should cover everything. The check written was only for $210. (The extra $100 was my accrued time off I hadn't taken.)
I had to scramble to get dcg's things together and told dcd specifically that I hadn't had time to clean the bottles because I do that after hours. He didn't mind, said he'd wash them at home. I packed up girls things and they left.
2 days later I get a long email from dcd about how dcm accused me of not properly caring for their daughter, how her diaper rash was exacerbated by me not changing her every 1-2 hours and that the bottles I sent home had mold in them. He informed me that no additional payment would be made and that if I attempted to contact them or collect, they'd contact the police. (I had to laugh at that one. The police don't care about civil issues.)
Then about 2 days later, Child Protective showed up at my door. I had a hunch they were coming. As soon as she walked in the door, I pulled dcg's file, showed the balance they owed and the check they stopped payment on. She knew right away it was a disgruntled former client that was on a high horse because of money and not because of child endangerment. She asked me what year my home was build (at the time it was only 16 years old), we don't live in a flood plain or near water and she asked to see the other infant bottles. No mold.
Apparently dcd provided pictured to Child Protective of the so called bottles and yes, there was mold in them but as I had mentioned to them, how do you know that those are the same 2 bottles that were here. How do you know they didn't find those out in the car or under a couch?
In the end, I got the last because it was quite easy to discredit the validity of the claim.
Comment