Yes this is an important part. There's little help out there to evaluate whether a child is truly disabled and if the disability laws apply. The natural inclination of parents, licensors, and doctors is that we just DO. That's an easy leap to make because it means someone ELSE has to take it on.
Once the same child is presented to the government for disability checks and insurance then all of a sudden it's a BIG long process. When presenting this child to the school system it's a big long process.
VERY often the COST of the child's care is actually HIGHER for the provider than the cost would be to a school or the governement when you look at her small income and her small population.
In this case the child has just seen an ER doctor in a crisis care unit for this diagnosis. That single trip to the ER would NEVER qualify the child to receive special needs services in a school setting or to receive cash and insurance subisidy for disabled children.
We are not required to assume this child qualifies as a disabled child and provide free medical care and medical services (consultation, training, conferencing) for the child. It may be that he is simply temporarily acutely ill at this time and this is something the parents need to completely manage as all parents have to do. It may not have anything whatsoever to do with a disability or child care.
The provider has to decide this for herself. If his care is not related at all to the disability act she has the right to refuse to provide services at times when the child needs the service. If his care IS covered by the disability act then she has to decide if the services he needs can be supported by her client base as not to substantially alter her program and pose an undo burden on her and her family.
Once the same child is presented to the government for disability checks and insurance then all of a sudden it's a BIG long process. When presenting this child to the school system it's a big long process.
VERY often the COST of the child's care is actually HIGHER for the provider than the cost would be to a school or the governement when you look at her small income and her small population.
In this case the child has just seen an ER doctor in a crisis care unit for this diagnosis. That single trip to the ER would NEVER qualify the child to receive special needs services in a school setting or to receive cash and insurance subisidy for disabled children.
We are not required to assume this child qualifies as a disabled child and provide free medical care and medical services (consultation, training, conferencing) for the child. It may be that he is simply temporarily acutely ill at this time and this is something the parents need to completely manage as all parents have to do. It may not have anything whatsoever to do with a disability or child care.
The provider has to decide this for herself. If his care is not related at all to the disability act she has the right to refuse to provide services at times when the child needs the service. If his care IS covered by the disability act then she has to decide if the services he needs can be supported by her client base as not to substantially alter her program and pose an undo burden on her and her family.
Comment