I understand both lines of thinking (i.e.: no refunds as a consequence AND return of money for no services rendered).
I just wanted to chime in with my own thoughts: I do think you should absolutely protect yourself (via your contract) when it comes to "no refunds" BUT leave it up to your discretion if you want to refund or not for immediate termination. Which is what the ultimate outcome was.
The reason I say this, is because yes, good relationships can go bad at the drop of a hat. We've seen what we thought were golden parents turn vindictive and mean too frequently.
If you don't have that verbiage in your contract, you open yourself up to potential parents that will act like an a** and break every policy they want just so you'll terminate and they'll get their money back.
I just wanted to chime in with my own thoughts: I do think you should absolutely protect yourself (via your contract) when it comes to "no refunds" BUT leave it up to your discretion if you want to refund or not for immediate termination. Which is what the ultimate outcome was.
The reason I say this, is because yes, good relationships can go bad at the drop of a hat. We've seen what we thought were golden parents turn vindictive and mean too frequently.
If you don't have that verbiage in your contract, you open yourself up to potential parents that will act like an a** and break every policy they want just so you'll terminate and they'll get their money back.
Comment